Skip to main content
University of Nebraska Omaha logo University of Nebraska Omaha
APPLY MY UNO DIRECTORY

Students Faculty Staff Community
University of Nebraska Omaha logo
College of Arts and Sciences
APPLY MY UNO DIRECTORY
Students Faculty Staff Community
  • About Us Backback to Main menu
    • About Us
    • Departments & Programs
    • News & Events
    • Dean's Office Staff
    • Faculty/Staff Resources
    • Organizational Chart
  • Academics Backback to Main menu
    • Undergraduate Programs
    • Graduate Programs
    • Love Your Major
    • Pre-Health
    • Pre-Law
    • Arts and Sciences Minors
    • Academic Advising
    • Academic Support
  • Admissions
  • Student Opportunities Backback to Main menu
    • Scholarships
    • Student Organizations
    • Internships
    • Study Abroad
  • Community Engagement Backback to Main menu
    • Community Engagement
    • College Centers
    • Conferences
    • Nature Preserves
    • Professional Services
    • Teacher Training
    • Youth Programs
  • Research Backback to Main menu
    • Research
    • Student Research Support
    • Social Science Research Commons
  • Support Us
  1. UNO
  2. College of Arts and Sciences
  3. CAS News
  4. 2020
  5. 08
  6. New Study Suggests Athlete Activism Doesn’t Impact Performance

New Study Suggests Athlete Activism Doesn’t Impact Performance

A new study from the UNO Department of Sociology and Anthropology shows athlete activism doesn’t impact performance.

  • published: 2020/08/31
  • contact: Courtni Kopietz - College of Arts and Sciences
image

Washington football players during the national anthem before a game on Sept. 24, 2017. Photo by Keith Allison via Wikimedia Commons.

Wednesday, Aug. 26, 2020 marked four years since Colin Kaepernick started peacefully protesting racial injustice during the national anthem at NFL games, an act that eventually led to his suspected blackballing from the league. There have been other protests in the years since, but particularly a renewed focus in 2020 as more athletes take a knee—or refuse to play at all—to protest violence against Black people and police brutality.

Daniel Hawkins, Ph.D., chair of the department of sociology & anthropology at UNO, recently completed research analyzing one argument that often comes up in the debate on athlete protests: do these protests negatively impact a player’s performance?

While the criticisms against athlete activism are varied, the argument that players will lose their edge and be unable to successfully compete in the world of elite sports is one that “seeks to delegitimize and derail athlete activism,” the paper states.

“Professional athletes have a highly visible platform to promote awareness of social issues and to become leaders of social movements,” Hawkins says. “But some people argue that stadiums or arenas are simply not the ‘right place’ for social activism. One tactic used to keep activism out of the sports world is to argue that athletes who protest before games will ‘distract’ themselves and their teammates from performing well when the competition starts. As far as we know, nobody has actually tested that argument with data.”

Hawkins, along with collaborators at Skidmore College and the University of Minnesota, specifically tested how athlete activism impacted performance on both the individual and team level during the 2017 NFL season, in the wake of Kaepernick’s 2016 demonstrations.

The short answer: it doesn’t.

We suspect that many people who secretly disagree with athletes’ social stances use this distraction argument because it appears to be a politically neutral and purely sports-based reason to oppose activism.

 Daniel Hawkins, Chair of Sociology & Anthropology

The study, available as a preprint in SocArXiv, found that neither a player’s own protests nor their teammates’ protests affected individual performance. And, by measuring a team’s performance relative to sportsbook expectations, no relationship was found between protests and team performance.

The null finding provides evidence that player protests have no effect on performance; they neither hinder nor facilitate success.

The study also looked at how players’ race, age, position, salary and contract length contributed to their likelihood to participate in the wave of protests.

The results found that, with all other factors equal, Black players were more likely to protest and almost 28 times more likely to kneel during the anthem, specifically, compared to non-Black players; and the higher the salary, the more likely a player would participate in kneeling as a protest. Other factors, like contract length and position, showed no effect on the likelihood of protesting.

While this study looked specifically at professional athletes, there is room to investigate further with athletes at the college or high school level.

“We suspect that many people who secretly disagree with athletes’ social stances use this distraction argument because it appears to be a politically neutral and purely sports-based reason to oppose activism,” Hawkins says. “And this argument, even if true, reduces athletes down to game-playing machines here for our entertainment rather than the complex and socially conscious humans they actually are. We hope our research, especially if confirmed by future studies, will show that this distraction argument is not a legitimate reason to limit athletes’ social activism.”

News Sections

  • College of Arts and Sciences News Center
  • UNO News Center
  • Maverick Daily
  • The Bullseye
  • Campus Events

Featured

  • Science, Spanish, Service — and a Future in Medicine
  • College of Arts and Sciences Celebrates Faculty and Staff Award Winners
  • Mavericks Transfer Geology Lessons to Real Life Through Trip to Death Valley
  • Math and Music: UNO Student’s Passions Transcend Disciplines

Most Viewed

  • Four College of Arts and Sciences Faculty Receive Weitz Innovation and Excellence Fund Awards
  • UNO Researchers Protect the Role Bats Play in Nebraska’s Ecosystem
  • UNO James Madison Fellow Inspires Next Generation of Civic Leaders in the Classroom

About the College of Arts and Sciences

College of Arts and Sciences

Contact Us
  • 220 Arts & Sciences Hall
  • College Advising Office
Social media
College Resources
  • For Faculty and Staff
  • Math-Science Learning Center
  • The Writing Center

Next Steps

  • Visit UNO
  • Request Information
  • Apply for Admission
  • The UNO Advantage
  • Our City (Omaha)

Just For You

  • Future Students
  • Current Students
  • Work at UNO
  • Faculty and Staff
  • A-Z List

Popular Services and Resources

  • my.unomaha.edu
  • Academic Calendar
  • Campus Buildings & Maps
  • Library
  • Pay Your Bill
  • Course Catalogs
  • Internships & Career Development
  • The Maverick Store
  • MavCARD Services
  • Military-Connected Resource Center
  • Speech Center
  • Writing Center
  • Human Resources
  • Center for Faculty Excellence

Affiliates

  • University of Nebraska System
  • NU Foundation
  • Buffett Early Childhood Institute
  • Daugherty Water for Food Institute
  • National Strategic Research Institute
  • Peter Kiewit Institute
  • Rural Prosperity Nebraska
  1. University Policies
  2. Privacy Statement
  3. Accessibility
  1. 402.554.2800

University of Nebraska Omaha
University of Nebraska Omaha, 6001 Dodge Street, Omaha, NE, 68182
  • ©  
  • Emergency Information Alert
  • MavsReport

Social Media


Omaha Skyline

Our Campus. Otherwise Known as Omaha.

The University of Nebraska does not discriminate based on race, color, ethnicity, national origin, sex, pregnancy, sexual orientation, gender identity, religion, disability, age, genetic information, veteran status, marital status, and/or political affiliation in its education programs or activities, including admissions and employment. The University prohibits any form of retaliation taken against anyone for reporting discrimination, harassment, or retaliation for otherwise engaging in protected activity. Read the full statement.